Thursday, March 17, 2016

Conversations on the reality and nature of God.

                   
   Conversations on the reality and nature of God.

For anyone who believes in a higher form of life, having some concept of God is useful and, indeed, necessary, as this concept acts as a focus for introspective thought, meditation and prayer and forms the foundation for further development and spiritual understanding.

Throughout history, there have been a number of different ideas on God, and each appears related to the culture and level of understanding of the people at the particular time. Even today, some are quite happy to accept a simple picture of God as a loving father, which is usually the case in a paternalistic culture in which members have strong feelings on the importance of family relationships. Yet, others who are more scientifically minded may well identify God with a formless, benevolent, pervasive energy acting as a first cause for natural phenomena.

If this link between historical milieu, culture, level of understanding, and concepts of God is understood, it is clear that we cannot really judge any one as any less acceptable than the other. Each concept of God may, in its own way, be seen as useful and important for the group by which it is accepted and can bring them the power of belief which can actually assist in religious and mystical experiences. Having a belief in God, one is able to categorise inner experiences within a workable framework and more able to accept and interpret them than one who has no such belief. In other words, in having a basic formulation of the existence, reality and nature of God, our minds are primed, predisposed and more receptive to higher spiritual knowledge.

The actual conceptualisation itself is not that important, as long as it fits our current level of understanding. The problem emerges when we cling to a rigid and unchanging idea of God due to indifference or a fear of change, even though we know it no longer meets our need for growth or greater spiritual experience.

Reasoning is the method we use to make sense of our experiences in life as they occur.  In this regard, personal experience would be a good criterion of truth, and a rational approach to spirituality would begin with an acceptance of the possible existence of another (higher) reality and a simple commitment to seeking a deeper understanding of this reality. With a reasonable degree of clarity and an open mind, we should at least be able to arrive at the position where we are willing to consider the possibility that a higher level of being and reality exists.

However, the reasoning process applied in coming to an understanding of God should be deductive rather than inductive. For instance, if we decide to construct our concept of God from the ground up using different ideas borrowed from religious scriptures or other (dogmatic) sources, there is a danger that we may end up with a fragmented framework which is like a jigsaw puzzle. This can be incomplete, containing unanswered questions, or have sectors that simply don’t ‘fit’, being full of contradictions. As a result, our understanding of God may remain poor, narrow and bigoted. This problem can already be seen in the exclusiveness of many formal religions or sects, which simply refuse to acknowledge the possibility that ‘their’ God is available to others of different cultures and times and able to include them in some way or other in a greater plan of unfoldment. Wars, inter‑racial hatred and religious intolerance are often the result of spiritual near‑sightedness, or of such deficient concepts of divine mercy.


A useful initial deductive framework could be derived from the mysteries of Nature and the visible universe. For example, if we take the time to observe Nature, we may notice a number of phenomena which cannot possibly be linked to anything else other than an underlying active and guiding force. Natural laws, cycles, regularity and intelligent design all point to events being more than mere coincidence. Second, if we relate visible aspects of Nature as well as our own selves, such as beauty (perfection), intelligence (consciousness), strength (power), love and cooperation (benevolence), balance (harmony), and growth (expansion) to principles within a higher source, we have the beginnings of a workable general concept of God. Using this framework, we can begin the deeper exploration of the reality and nature of God.

As a cognitive scientist, I have personally found the idea of a ‘universal mind’ particularly useful in understanding existence and reality, in that aspects of a higher source can be seen reflected within our own minds. For example, our ability to form three-dimensional mental images can be related to an act of creation taking place in a universal mind, and we ourselves, could be seen as archetypal expressions of this one universal mind.



Jimmy Henderson is a cognitive scientist, but also a metaphysician with a holistic view of life and reality. This article is based on his book ‘In Search of The Oracle’ available online through his website www.jimmyhendersonbooks.com.

Monday, February 22, 2016

Meditating for Wisdom


Meditation for wisdom 
By Jimmy Henderson

Our inner being is a source of knowledge and power which we can approach daily in an attempt to answer many important questions on the meaning of life, on who and what we are, our ethics and morality, our world with its natural laws and so-called supernatural events and the existence of a higher spiritual reality and God. How we access this knowledge has been for many centuries the subject matter of science, psychology, philosophy, Theology and mysticism. I believe that these are ultimately all different approaches or paths to the same source of knowledge and revelation that is available to us deep within the levels of our own consciousness.

In this regard, we can make use of advanced techniques such as meditation. One such exercise, a visualisation called the “Oracle”, has proved to be extremely powerful. This particular technique was used extensively as a basis to my book "In Search of the Oracle" (2002) and is presented here. The technique is quite advanced and is recommended for those who have already performed inner work.

This is first an exercise in imagery and visualisation in which you use a very light meditative state to form a mental picture of an "oracle". This should be an old man or woman who symbolises to you, “God ", "wisdom ", "inner guidance" or merely a wise person whom you can trust and respect. A suitable simple imaginary context is also required for this visualisation, such as seeing yourself slowly climbing a mountain to visit this oracle who is seated in a cave, or on  a rock on top of this mountain. This exercise can be accompanied by suitable soft, background music.

After you have entered a meditative state, visualise yourselves initially standing facing the mountain and slowly beginning the climb towards the top. As you continue with the climb, note any vegetation, trees, flowers or rocks which spontaneously appear along the way. These images are placed there by your subconscious mind, and indicate that you have attained its cooperation during this exercise. 

Once you reach the top of the mountain, imagine the oracle sitting a short distance away in front of you. You should see yourselves moving towards him (or her) with your head bowed and pose your question simply and unambiguously. The answer will generally be short and will simply "pop" into your mind, but do not consider it immediately, but merely give thanks, walk backwards away from the oracle and descend the mountain. Once you have returned to your starting point, consider what was said and write it down for further interpretation. If you have more than one question, it will be a good idea to prepare them beforehand on paper, in which case, do not descend the mountain immediately, but merely withdraw from the oracle, write down the reply to the first question and then proceed to approach him or her once more for answers to the other questions (one at a time).


If you wish to gain maximum benefits from this visualisation exercise, return to it regularly over a few weeks or even months, and extend the context to include yourself as one of a group of  students serving the oracle, in which case you can continually return to where you left off on a daily basis and pose further questions as the opportunity arises. Once you have mastered the technique, you will begin to experience yourselves as actually becoming one with the oracle and receiving inner guidance directly, but this comes much later. 

Jimmy Henderson is a mystic and metaphysical teacher. This article is an extract from "In Search of the Oracle" , published by Jimmy and available online at htpps://www.amazon.com/Search-Oracle-Book-Spiritual-Philosophy-ebook/dp/B00LI91HHC/ref=sr_1_8?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1456146680&sr=1-8&keywords=jimmy+henderson or through his website www.jimmyhendersonbooks.com

Thursday, January 21, 2016

Who are we?

                                    Who are we?
 ‘I turned my face away only for a moment, but in this moment I lost sight of my Father and my God. Living as we are, on the fringes of both the spiritual and material worlds, we fulfil a divine purpose, as active agents of God’s Will, by finding ourselves at the forefront of this battle to expand the light of His presence. Unfortunately, due to our present state, we have for the most part forgotten our true origins as a being of light and are not fully aware of this drama which is being enacted and in which we are active players. In this way we are caught up in a situation which we do not fully understand, with spiritual, intellectual and emotional tools which are presently inadequate. Fortunately, it is also true that we are now finally evolving more fully after living in ignorance and darkness for many eons. It is this history of which we must now speak’.
J. Henderson
                                             
When we look in the mirror we see a body. But is this really ‘us’ in the true sense of the word? The most common scientific belief is that we are only physical organisms and that the human mind is only a ‘phenomenon’ brought about by the activity of the brain. It is true that that which we see and experience is our body, and it is very easy to accept that this is who we are. However, this presents a difficulty (which has still not been satisfactorily resolved), in understanding how the brain, which is a physical neurological structure, can produce an inner experience in the form of self-awareness, or a level of consciousness which even our most sophisticated computers are unable to mimic.

The issue becomes easier to explain if we accept the possibility of a higher level of consciousness from which our present self-awareness originates, a conscious state which is merely being stepped down or mediated by our neural structures. There are obviously also philosophical problems associated with this idea, such as how a non-material substance (consciousness) can be taken up and transmuted by the brain structures. However, it is clear from everyday life that our physical bodies and (non-material) minds do affect one another, and until our research and technology has evolved sufficiently to fully explain this interaction, the latter view still provides the most practical benefits for our thinking. 
For example, believing in a higher world of mind and consciousness opens the door for a new view of mankind as multi-dimensional beings with an almost unlimited potential, and would explain our almost intuitive belief that we all have a deeper spiritual side to ourselves, a higher or more authentic ‘self’ from which our present ethics, morality and higher mental faculties are derived, that which, in religious terms, could be described as the ‘soul’. However, if we are intimately connected to a more perfect self or soul, how do we explain the present state of mankind, the greed, the thirst for power and the violent, destructive force of human actions? When contemplating this question of the nature of my true being, I was reminded of the analogy of the caterpillar and the butterfly.

In Nature insects often go through a larval stage, engage in a struggle for survival and later emerge from their chrysalis having evolved into adults. In the larval stage, the insect is very primitive and destructive, devouring all in its path. Only later, as it matures and the outer casing falls away, does the ‘inner being’ emerge, which is more perfect.
   
I was able to relate this analogy to ourselves, in that, in our casing of humanity, we also struggle to learn and grow. Like the insect larva, the ego of the undeveloped human being can also be very destructive, selfishly using and devouring everything in its efforts to meet its most basic needs. However, in line with the caterpillar analogy, we will also one day evolve to become a new being, full of light and power.

The limitations of our physical bodies and our imperfect minds suggest that we are still in the early stages of this process, and busy with the struggle that is necessary when the butterfly leaves its chrysalis and strengthens its wings in order to fly. In our own lives, this struggle translates into many painful and life-changing events, but also includes times which bring joy, happiness and success.

Sometimes we feel lost in a world which, on the surface at least, appears to be spinning out of control. However, if we look more carefully and deeply, we may see that, on a broader level, the Universe is still unfolding as it should, even if we are not able to understand the entire process at present. Being active participants and integral players in this ongoing drama, it is extremely difficult for us to step ‘outside of the box’ and find the universal perspective that is needed.

So how can we explain this idea of a more authentic (or higher) self in the light of our present human limitations and propensity for error? Many ancient texts, including religious scriptures, suggest that we have ‘devolved’ (or fallen) from a superior race of Man, far more perfect than today, one which was ‘of one mind ‘with the Father and part of the original plan of divine self-expression. This is discussed in more modern terms by the author Soozi Holbeche in her book, Changes (1997), in which she explains that we need to understand that we are actually spiritual beings having a human experience and not vice versa. In other words, at the centre of our beings we are still that original perfect creation, but due to a separation from our true or authentic selves, we are now clothed in our present (human) form with an accompanying loss of consciousness and understanding. Our goal in life should therefore be one of regaining this lost connection, and returning to a state of oneness with our true selves.   

Extract from ‘Living on the Edge of Darkness’ by Jimmy Henderson. Available on Amazon, Barnes and Noble and Smashwords in e-book format via his website

www.jimmyhendersonbooks.com